Tuesday, 18 August 2026

1471 Campaign Turn 1




Note - the last blog post set out a campaign engine for running a 1471 Wars of the Roses game. The ongoing delays in Blogger resulted in the post not being published for 27 hours, by which time, the posts likely slipped out of view on many readers lists. 


A lot of work went into the post and it is now clear to me that the efforts of posting big pieces of work here are no longer worthwhile until such time as Blogger gets itself sorted out. 


For now, I am resolved to stop posting on Blogger and just update my COMMANDERS site instead.


HOWEVER, having played the first turn of the 1471 campaign, I am posting the result here, in the hope that Blogger publishes it reasonably quickly, giving readers another chance to see the last post that delivers the campaign engine (link below), …. I am not holding my breath and now care little as my own (paid for) Commanders site can better be relied upon for promptness etc and this stuff will be posted there today anyway.


Anyway, for one last time, here we go!


1471 Campaign Turn 1.


Having set down the game engine, in the last blog post, for running a themed campaign for Wars of the Roses 1471, the campaign is now up and running and the first turn has been played. [link to the game engine post below].


One of the key elements of the campaign is that instructions are written for the forces in each area of the map, folded and put into a draw cup and then one at a time they are drawn and acted upon, so the order that they are drawn becomes central to driving the campaign narrative and it proves to be a very solo friendly way of running a campaign.


First though we roll on the event table ...... Queen Margaret of Anjou can arrive at either Southampton, Devon or Kent, though the location must be either Lancastrian controlled or neutral. She brings foreign forces to support the Lancastrian cause. 1 x Pike, 1 x Melee, 1 x Handgunner.


Next, orders are written for all locations that contain a force. This, including Margaret, turns out to be 6 locations, so 6 sets of orders. 


Now we go on to drawing those orders. This is going to be interesting because Warwick wants to strike at Howard before the main army under Edward arrives at Nottingham.




Above map - at start positions, red is Lancastrian, white is Yorkist. Yellow is independent and garrisoned (Durham). All the black dots are neutral.


Drawing from the cup


1st Order - KENT. Fauconberg marches to Southampton, where he is to meet with Margaret and combine their forces. Southampton’s allegiance changes from neutral to Lancastrian.


2nd Order - LONDON. Suddley continues to garrison the city, protecting King Henry VI.


3rd Order - YORK. Edward is here with the main Yorkist army. Hastings sends 1 x militia and 1 x artillery up north to besiege Durham. He sends 1 x melee to Shrewsbury to Garrison it. The attack at Durham fails, but Shrewsbury’s allegiance turns Yorkist and now has a Yorkist garrison force.


Edward takes the rest of the army and marches south to join Howard at Nottingham.


4th Order - COVENTRY. Warwick, with the main Lancastrian army, attacks Nottingham. Though Hastings in Edward’s army has sent some units to Durham and Shrewsbury, Howard's forces, already waiting at Nottingham, make up for that. 


A significant battle results (detailed below).


5th Order - OVERSEAS. Queen Margaret of Anjou lands at Southampton with her reinforcements. Her forces combine with Lord Fauconberg. Southampton's allegiance becomes Lancastrian.


6th Order - NOTTINGHAM. Howard was to start preparing defensive positions, but Warwick’s arrival (order 4) has pre-empted him now being able to do that.


The Battle at Nottingham (rules used are Test of Resolve).


While Warwick deployed under the typical three battle formations of vanward, mainward and rearward (Clarence, Warwick and Oxford), Edward deployed into four battles.


Hastings, who had sent detachments to Durham and Shrewsbury took the reserve position behind Edward in the centre, while Edward's left was held by Howard, who had fewer melee troops. Gloucester was on the right.


Seeing fewer flags on Edwards left, Warwick’s plan was to advance his army quickly and hope to unhinge Howard before the Yorkist reserve could move over to support him.


Edward was content to make maximum use of his archers before any contact was made and he sought a more defensive stance.





Edward’s and Warwick’s battles in the centre were the first to clash, but Warwick quickly got the upper hand. Disastrously, during the initial fighting, Edwards Men-at-Arms turned tail and retreated, pursued by Warwick’s men, who caught them and continued to inflict heavy losses.





Along the Yorkist line, contingents started to rout, first archers running in panic, followed by the guns being overrun. There was significant pressure from the Lancastrians everywhere.





Losing his Men-at-Arms to rout was the last straw for Edward. he decided the army needed to retreat now to save itself, but disengaging was difficult and more losses followed. Edward stayed on the field until the last possible moment, to see the last of his archers and billmen escape (In consequence, in future actions, Edward will be rated as an inspirational leader).


Gloucester’s entire wing had routed (dispersed in Test of Resolve terms) and he (side note - the future King Richard III) just about escaped with his life (rolling on the post game loss table).  


The remnants of the Yorkist army retreated back up the road towards York. This had been a terrible opening of the campaign for Edward, his shattered army would not withstand another head-to-head with Warwick.





Above - this is what the campaign map looks like at the end of Turn 1 (you can click on it). Edward is getting squeezed. If we add the Victory Points of allegiance at this stage, the Lancastrians are leading with 7 points to 3. Can Edward hold on?


Warwick has the initiative and what happens next will be of his making! His prime objective is to put Clarence on the Throne, so does he turn south, take London and capture Henry VI or does he drive north to deal with the much weakened Edward .... or something else altogether? 


Turn 2 is already under way.


EDIT - for anyone now reading this, the campaign has been concluded and is presented in chronological order at my Commanders site at this link;


https://commanders.simdif.com/campaigning_1471.html

 

Resources;

The blog post that delivers the campaign engine is at this link -


https://battlefieldswarriors.blogspot.com/2026/08/practical-campaigning-1471.html

COMMANDERS is my other bit of webspace. It is a bit more snippet based than here, more updated more often - LINK

https://commanders.simdif.com/dear_diary.html

 

40 comments:

  1. Great campaign system! Orders out of a jar! Brilliant!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Morris, its probably early days, but so far it seems to be delivering what I was hoping for.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well! This is certainly not the campaign start Edward expected! Is your intent to offer only snippets from battle rather than recounting the entire affair?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Jon,Edward has much to be concerned about. Yes, of late I have started to put more about the situation, mechanics etc in my reports than of detailed action, aiming for a 60 / 40 to 70 / 30 ratio. Also it is a better fit for the Commanders site, as I am limited there with regards to the number of supporting pictures that I can include.

      Delete
  4. That is very interesting and looks to be ideal for a solo player - not too complicated as a campaign but likely to throw up interesting situations. Sorry to hear of your blog problems but hope there will be interesting developments on your COMMANDERS site.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Jim, I have just rolled for events for turn 2 and written down the various orders. Everything will move to Commanders now, the downside is that comments don’t really work well there.

    I am expanding the solo aspect by sometimes adding more than 1 set of orders for the same people, where there is an obvious choice. First order drawn for that group gets used and the secondary order ignored when drawn.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This is really an awesome system for solo campaigns Norm. Very elegant but very simple and will create lots of interesting situations.

    I do like the emphasis on the campaign and not the battles. This makes your job easier while still giving us the necessary details.

    Can we comment on your Commanders' page? I could not see where I could do this. If not, please be assured I will be following closely.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Ben, it does seem to be working straight off the bat, so that is good.

      Alas! the comment thing, Commanders does have a comment facility (it is switched off), but it is so archaic compared to the simplicity and order here. I have to keep flipping from being inside the website to authorise comments (including my own) and then adding my own comments from outside, on the public platform, before going back in to authorise those comments. On top of that, the ordering of comments and replies are disjointed.

      In the end, out of administrative frustration, I turned the comments off.

      However, some water has passed under the bridge since then and it is hard to imagine that this is not an area that the company upgraded, so I will check it out ..... if not, they have just asked for feedback :-)

      Delete
    2. Ben I have looked at this, it is just like before and I had forgotten, to make matters worse, not only do I have to go in and approve all comments, but to have them shown, I need to re-publish the site! that doesn't take long, but it is a faff, when you add in that I need to keep coming out of the site, so that I can add replies, then go back in, approve my own reply and then republish the site!

      I am going to see whether it is worth going to another provider.

      Delete
    3. That does not sound very workable Norm.
      Could I suggest an alternative? Perhaps on the blog just post the title and a link back to your commanders site and on your commanders site have a link to the blog page. That way we could easily leave our comments here while all the detail in on the commanders site.
      It would not matter when the blog appeared on others' blog rolls as we would reach it from your commanders' site.
      A little bit awkward but perhaps simpler than what you described.
      Anyway, just a random thought and feel free to ignore 😁

      Delete
    4. Ben, that is a very good idea. Last night I spent ages trying to find a better commercial alternative that had a simple interface.

      Another problem with my Commanders site is that it is relatively self contained and small, so posts there tend to be transient, they hand around for a while and then get removed to make way for more new stuff, the impact of that, when linked back to the blog would be that over time, the blog would end up with numerous broken links ...... would that matter? I don't know, the people searching the back catalogue don't tend to talk to me anyway, so I would be none the wiser!

      Frustratingly, Blogger when it works seems to be the best solution for our blogging community! The search for a solution actively continues.

      In its present form (delays) Blogger discourages posts that have a lot of time spent on them - perhaps that is the answer! :-)

      Delete
  7. What a disastrous start for the Yorkists Norm, enjoyable read and looking forward to turn 2, the campaign is truly up and running!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Donnie, I suppose the solo value of the campaign is already present ..... as I was also shocked at the disaster and it is already setting things off on a new path .... good! though of course, it may also be a very short campaign :-)

      Delete
  8. Off to a fine start there Norm, most encouraging for future turns.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Phil, I thought I would run this as a slow burn project, but after the turn 1 events, I can't wait to get Turn 2 done ...... mainly to see if there is a still a game left :-)

      Delete
  9. Excellent start to your campaign, well maybe not if your Edward, but it seems to be working really well, will you continue to post this campaign on the Lead adventure forum so we can comment there, if its difficult on your other site?
    Best Iain

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Iain, I hadn't thought of doing that, but it is a very good idea. I had put turn 1 up there, more to round off the opening explanation of campaign mechanics, but it would be as good a place as any to do that sort of thing.

      Delete
  10. Great stuff Norm, a good start to the campaign ? As for blogger I try to limit the amount of time taken to create posts as we have so little control over who or how many people see stuff.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Matt, I think oil this occasion by annoyance came from two the meeting of extremes. Firstly it was just one of those post that demanded a lot of work and secondly the delay was 27 hours, which I think is up there amongst the longest delays. The delay on this post for example was a mere 8 hours!

      You posts are labour intensive and it is a shame to see subject to the same variables. I hope they fix it soon.

      Delete
  11. A good start to the campaign. The post game checks on the commanders helps with the campaign narrative.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Peter, I must admit I held my breath a few times, but in the spirit of remaining true to whatever the dice / system deal out, I think you end up with a better storyline.

      Delete
  12. Great stuff, I wasn't expecting such a large and decisive battle so soon! The narrative is also very helpful for explaining how the campaign system works. BTW this post was in my feed first thing, so arrived very promptly. Yesterdays was a few posts back but still on the front page.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Hi Martin, the action took me by surprise and the degree of victory just added to that ..... what to do next! :-)

    I think it is a lottery where the post ends up on feed. If one's own favoured feeds just happen to all be posting around the same time (and weekends have a higher chance of that), then new posts are quickly off the page. I have noted some bigger feeds look the same 3 days later and others have a full refresh within 18 hours or so.

    ReplyDelete
  14. That was a lot of fun to read, Norm and to get what could be a very decisive battle in turn 1 sounds very ominous for the white rose! Already looking forward to P2!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Hi Ray, it all started off by diving straight into the deep end! Is there anywhere to go with this now? 😀 Turn 2 will tell all!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. well, I must admit to being slightly surprised by how turn 2 unfolded!

      Delete
  16. Thanks Michal - it is working well.

    ReplyDelete
  17. What a great start for the Lancastrians Norm! An unexpected result like this can make the campaign all the more exciting - we will have to wait and see.
    I am sorry you are so irritated by Blogger that you are going to absent yourself again, as I probably won't try to navigate the Commander's site and I have never been on the Lead Adventure thing. My main interest in the posting and blogging is the interaction with you and 20 or 30 (max) other regulars - so being unable to comment on what you are doing will be a bit of a blow! I hope you come back again (as on previous occasions!)

    ReplyDelete
  18. Hi Keith, I hope Blogger gets its act together which is directly related to what level of resourcing that Google are willing to put behind the platform.

    As most of my posts take several hours of work and more! I can’t see me using Blogger until things resolve, a shame because having looked around, Blogger is pretty much the perfect fit for many of us.

    Last time I abandoned Blogger, I was just worn out with social media, my reasons now are quite different.

    I might end up posting the odd photo on Blogger with a link back to commanders, but that is just about as superficial as FaceBook and Since commander posts are quite transient and regularly deleted to free up room, then the W&B blog would end up with a load of broken links. I don’t think there are really any satisfactory answers.

    I hope you do browse Commanders from time to time, but I know my audience there has a smaller footprint than at B&W.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Norm, thanks a lot! your idea of pulling sequential orders out of a pot has given me the missing piece in my attempts at a map movement no-umpire or even solo campaign! Also love what you did in turn 2 with the different orders for a non-player side army. It's even possible to have two different strategies for the non-player that involve coordinating all its forces by marking them strategy A and strategy B on the paper slips and the applying the one that is drawn first as you did for a single army.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Hi Morris, yes and if you have 2 plans, but you think one is more viable than the other, you could write out 3 sets of orders, giving the more likely order 2 chances of being drawn. I am just in turn 3 now and I think it will be an exciting turn to write up 😀

    ReplyDelete
  21. For the readers info - the campaign has concluded and has been written up in chronological order on my Commanders web site at this link;

    https://commanders.simdif.com/campaigning_1471.html

    ReplyDelete
  22. This looks like it is working a treat norm and I will head off to your Commanders ite in due course to see how things are going:). just back from hols so shame to see Blogger is STILL playing up:(.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Hi Steve, good to see you back in good old Blighty! The Commanders entry is now offering the full playing of the campaign and is a coffee and biscuit job :-) There are quite a few subjects that I can see this campaign model working for.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I have to admit I've never experienced this delay thing on Blogger, but then my articles/posts don't tend to be long... Have you considered porting your blog to Wordpress instead?? Using the export function on Blogger and then Import to Wordpress.. or that's how it used to work! 😁

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Steve, I looked at a few alternatives and Blogger seems to serve our needs the best …… when it is fully functioning. For now, I will just put less effort into it and do a bit more on my reliable Commanders site …. Although that has a poor commenting facility 😀 hard to win!

      Delete
    2. Not only the commenting - but the other issue for me with the Commanders site is that I can't get it to feed the app I use to read all the blogs I follow (I use Feedly).. doesn't look like it has an RSS feed, so unless I specifically go there there's no way I see any updates

      Delete
    3. Yep, it’s shame, I pay for that space and it has some good tech behind it, but the blog aspect is archaic.

      Delete

Thank you for visiting.